It would take nearly 3 months before the leak was stopped, and nearly 5 months before the well was declared effectively dead. In the Case study on bp oil spill Mapping methodology the facilitator anticipates that the group may disagree so all three responses are written down. The first plan action item was to attempt to use functionality within the blowout preventer BOP which had failed to seal the well.
Where did it happen? When did it happen? Oil leaked at a high rate which is difficult to calculate. BP executives declared it was not their accident, blamed their contractors and made the company look arrogant and callous.
The rig itself capsized and sank, and will not be used again. The impact this oil spill was depended on which parts of the coastline you look at. There is no need to spend time debating the problem. What is the problem? In JuneBP issued its final estimate of the cost of the spill, the largest in U.
Some of the specifics may never be known as the evidence required is lost with the rig and the workers who were killed. No accidents, no harm to people, and no damage to the environment.
The Cause Map starts by writing down the goals that were affected as defined in the problem outline. The oil spill posed risks to the environment and affected local industry.
The physical location is where geographically the incident happened. BP said the idea was to help people on the Gulf find the right forms to fill out quickly and effectively.
The case of BP oil spill in provides an important example for understanding how these principles are valued by public opinion in a crisis situation, and how the communication actions by a corporation in this type of circumstances might have long-term effect on the brand image of the organization.
Public criticism and outrage following the incident not only focused on the oil spill, but on the lack of remorse and sincerity from the top management in crisis response, particularly the lack of sympathy to the victims of the disaster. The amount of detail provided in an analysis must be adequate to determine effective solutions in reducing the impacts to the goals.
Each step will be discussed below. The magnitude of this incident is defined by the impact to the goals. The next plan aimed to end the flow from Macondo well by ramming heavy mud and cement directly into the well itself.
More solutions were still needed.
The Cause Mapping method utilizes three steps: The next part of the outline captures the impact to the overall goals. Its own spill plan, filed the year before with the federal government, says of public relations: At the time of the explosion, the rig was performing the final phase of drilling an exploratory well.
In an investigation there can be several pieces of information that need to be captured when specifying the location. Local industries, such as fishing was threatened. In the case of Deepwater Horizon, the immediate solutions focused on stopping the oil flow out of the damaged riser.
It quickly became clear that the emergency measures taken prior to evacuation had not sealed the well and that great amounts of oil were leaking into the Gulf of Mexico. The static kill was completed on August 4th. The federal government estimated 4.
Under the settlement with BP, five states in the Gulf area and local governments will receive payments over the next dozen years. Three days later, the operation was stopped when it became clear the top kill was no match for the flow from the well. An important difference was confusing test pressure results.
Environmental impact Environmental worker rescuing an oil-covered pelican Plants and animals were completely covered in the oil. Plan B involved the installation of a cofferdam, a dome that would be placed over the leak and divert the oil to a surface ship.This case was prepared by Christina Ingersoll (MBA Class of ) and Cate Reavis, Manager, MSTIR, under the supervision the Deepwater Horizon disaster was the largest marine oil spill ever to occur in U.S.
waters. By the time the well was capped on July 15,nearly five million barrels of oil BP AND THE DEEPWATER. Our case studies demonstrate how root cause analysis applies to a variety of problematic scenarios.
This study investigates the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. The Race to Kill the BP Oil Gusher by Joel Achenbach. A secondary school revision resource for GCSE Geography on the topic of waste and pollution, including strategies to reduce global waste production and case studies.
Case Study: BP Oil Spill Background. This lesson has addressed the key components of ethical principles in crisis communication, including the ethical principles of responsibility, accountability, and humanistic care.
>BP Oil Spill also called the Deepwater Horizon oil spill was an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico near Mississippi River Delta, United States.
>At approximately pm on 20 Aprilan explosion had occur, causing a massive oil spill in the Gulf. BP's Deepwater Oil Spill Case Study Analysis - Business Ethics 1.
Group 9 THE GULF COAST AND THE BP OIL SPILL BUSINESS ETHICS CASE STUDY 1.Download