Keeping track of complex kinship arrangements. Which makes me think that, perhaps unconsciously, these authors have used actual people as templates.
We must be careful here. Many animals seem to circle their food in repetitive ways, or have certain approaches to it or ways of cleaning it that seem repetitive or organized and consonant with the way the authors have described the term "ritual" for the purposes of their study. Cats, domesticated and wild, often play with their food.
That is not to say that every culture views the spiritual in an animistic way, either. Ns mave have had rituals around hunting preparation, stalking, processing, and return that would be invisible to us. What qualifies as "supernatural"?
Of course I Googled them, but I am tired of spending all my time on Google. It is just that for most people on earth, for most of human people, religion and culture, religion and life, have not been separate experiences.
I have no idea. And I know several of these people.
They did not feel the need. Most cultures do not even have a word for religion. Though we should still move forward with what we know, of course.
But brain wiring is a funny thing. Nevertheless, there is only so much you can infer without seeing the entire brain, and indeed only so much you can infer from actually seeing the brain, because we are making and have made a lot of mistakes with animal brains as it is.
This is not an insult, because the authors take care to let us know that Ns have plenty of strengths as well as limitations, just like any of us. Again, we cannot know, and therefore it is irresponsible to say, even to speculate, that they did not. Supposedly the skull shape would lend itself to the formation of parts of the brain devoted to one type of memory but not another.
They seem to believe that Neandertals lacked this, too, but the basis for this completely escapes me. Sooooo, everything we know about Ns comes from these few sites.
Which is not much to go on, and depends on what has fossilized. Most of his brain has turned to water; he only has a small amount of brain matter at the very edges, yet he is at the top of his class in mathematics at Oxford.
Another problem is that the inferences about N personality are not just drawn from the archaeological evidence but also from the shapes of the head. They may even have had freckles. It is possible that ritual items consisted of perishable items--flowers or herbs, say--that did not survive.
Unlike Cro-Mags, N women and children actively participated in the hunts and would have been returning with the men, so this would have been communal time, as was processing the meat on-site, whereas Cro-Mags would have needed the feasting, dancing, and other ritualized events as rites to reassemble everyone after the men returned from the hunt and the women and children from gathering.
That is, at holding a lot of things in mind at once.
They were humans, and could probably talk and even had lighter skin, compared to the modern humans they lived alongside toward the end there, and lighter hair red hair in some cases and eyes.
Ns did not have extensive hearths and there are no signs of their having spent a lot of time sitting around fires, presumably singing, dancing, telling stories, etc.
The question is whether they make those comparisons well. I believe animism is a far too simplistic term. What if they just thought it was much cooler, possibly even more sacred, to hunt mammoths?
Yet, the authors here propose a personality profile of an entire human strain that actually does look like a subtype of ADHD. That is, monotheistic traditions. It seems there are very few sites, maybe 50 or so, representing an occupation of at leastyears.
The authors maintain they probably had none. Perhaps drums or gourds were thought to be alive and were burned at the ends of their "lives. I once dated a behavioral psychology professor I know, I know!
So, it is possible that Ns were immersed in their experience of the sacred and they did not consider finding a way to express it. The notion that they were hulking, primate-looking beasts comes from a skeleton of a man who had been horribly injured and whose spine had healed into a hunched position.Dec 28, · You may think you know someone who thinks like a Neanderthal.
You may even think you know someone who is a Neanderthal, or at least part one. Chances are you’re right about both.
Webster’s. How to Think Like a Neandertal is an interesting book about an interesting people. I only wish it were possible to know more about the Neandertals. 2 people found this helpful. How to Think Like a Neandertal has ratings and 37 reviews. Iset said: I have to say this is one of the better non-fictions I’ve read about Neanderta /5.
Sep 07, · Yet cognition certainly took place in the Neanderthal brain — the largest in human evolution, housed in a long, distinctively shaped skull.
In How to Think Like a Neandertal, archaeologist Thomas Wynn and psychologist Frederick Coolidge provide one of the most rounded portraits yet of a fossil human.
The book covers familiar areas. An anthropologist and a psychologist apply concepts from their respective disciplines to speculate on the mental processes and social organization of our distant, Neandertal.
Buy How To Think Like a Neandertal on mi-centre.com FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders/5(25).Download