America, the founder of modern day democracy, took years Jihad vs macworld get it where it is today that is equal rights for both men and women, black and white event though in theory it was like this years ago. While an autocratic regime can slow the "shock value" of immediate capitalist market, the reform of the market into capitalist structure gradually undermines the autocratic regime.
Thus, a capitalist systems serves only as catalyst for democracy itself. McWorld By Benjamin R. The nation-state would play a diminished role, and sovereignty would lose some of its political potency. I do not think it is a coincidence that the rise of Christian right as a strong political movement in the US during W years mirrors that Islamic fundamentalism in the middle east following the unfettered rule of secular globalization that characterized the Clinton years.
He uses the term jihad to mean sectarian violence and the MacWorld as free-flow global capitalism. McWorld may promote peace and prosperity, but Barber sees this as being done at the cost of independence and identityand Jihad vs macworld that no more social justice or equality than necessary are needed to promote efficient economic production and consumption.
I like Barber conclusion of how to stop the forces of McWorld and Jihad from further destabilizing Democratic institution of a nation-state. We have to face the fact that jobs that can be offshored will be offshored and nothing we can do will change that.
He states its a bad thing that corporations take advantage of social issues in order to market itself. Although I myself tend to be an ardent proponent of free-market globalization, he does bring up interesting points in that the media industrial complex sole purpose is to grow and make profits to that end it does not look toward "good cultural values" that most Americans profess to.
For instance, cutting down a jungle will upset the overall oxygen balance, which affects our "global lungs". So I think all the remaining oil reserves in the US should Jihad vs macworld saved only for national security disaster in the scale of WWIII and should not be tapped before then just to depress oil prices for an American consumer addicted to oil.
Feb 03, Ilana rated it liked it A little too dramatic and pessimistic for my taste His answer to this quandary is to go back to 19th century America in which civic institutions in which engaged citizens are empowered to do something for their communities instead of being passive spectators so common in today partisanship politics or otherwise disinterested consumers who are only interested in their individual wants.
Also the most troubling aspect of these chapters is the fact that these media outlets have engaged in "synergy" which is basically monopoly of the media outlets which in the end decreases consumer choice.
Mar 21, Patrick rated it liked it This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. Also for me personally, an increase of multitude advertisements have created an environment in which advertisements have become white noise that I ignore.
I think more and more American prowess in the economy will heavily rely on an innovative entrepreneurial spirit that can create new industries and thus new jobs.
In this important new book, he explores the alarming repercussions of this potent dialectic for democracy. Finally, he gets to the heart of the issue of whether Islamic fundamentalism that so grips the middle east can coexist with capitalistic liberal democracy.
Given that these companies are mutli-national entities, how can we lessen the cultural friction that these companies present themselves and thus adversely effects us?
The only way to turn Muslim countries into stable liberal democracy is to actively favor moderate forms of Islam like Sufism while at the same time forcing autocratic rulers in the country to liberalize their economy to foster a growing middle class so when the wave democracy eventually takes route in those countries then they are less likely to decouple themselves from the global economy.
I guess the best way to combat this, is to make sure the internet becomes an adjunct to our lives instead of living life on the internet.
This collective communal response to the forces of capitalism devoid of the soul and its corresponding humanity is dangerous to liberal democracy because it places an "us vs them" mentality that goes against civil liberty, rights of the minority, and the corresponding exchange of ideas at the heart of democracy.
McWorld holds up a sharp, clear lens to the dangerous chaos of the post-Cold War world. These two tendencies are sometimes visible in the same countries at the same instant: Also if one wants to, one can block out advertisement with the new technology of DVR, one can ignore advertisements of one chooses.
I guess one can change this by making people in the US conscious of the fact that these are not values we want as a society. With the emergence of our markets, we have come up with international laws and treaties in order to maintain stability and efficiency in the interconnected economy.
Resources are also an imperative aspect in the McWorld, where autarky seems insufficient and inefficient in presence of globalization. I think the Iraq and Egypt experiments in democracy will highly telling on how to proceed forward especially on the issue of can the Muslim Brotherhood thrive inside a democratic Egypt in which they have a stake but not a majority stake in government?
His challenges the fact that global capitalism and democracy go together or one leads to the other. Civil society has to be built from the inside out. He does make a strong case against newly unfettered capitalist reform in a setting of weak democratic institutions which caused chaos in Russia and to some extent other former Soviet sphere of influence states such as East Germany.
While its true corporations market itself in the sole goal in order to make money, using marketing to highlight social issues is also a good thing because it shows social issues that might have not been brought to an awareness of the consumer. Barber complains that America is more and more dependent on other countries.
Due to globalization, our market has expanded and is vulnerable to the transnational markets where free trade, easy access to banking and exchange of currency are available.
In order to combat the profit-driven McWorld running over weak democratic governments and sectarian Jihad, he advocates using a global network of engaged citizens via the internet to monitor the worst abuses of McWorld and Jihad.
Barber states that even though the US is losing the deficit war in terms of manufacturing jobs, and possibly soft ware jobs, we are winning the war in terms of new service jobs of the 21st century because like always we create an industry out of thin air and run with it.Jihad vs.
McWorld is a groundbreaking work, an elegant and illuminating analysis of the central conflict of our times: consumerist capitalism versus religious. Jihad vs. McWorld The following article from The Atlantic Online, has been reposted here.
It looks at the issue of democracy and how neither terrorism nor corporate globalization necessarily support democracy.
Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism's Challenge to Democracy [Benjamin Barber] on mi-centre.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Jihad vs. McWorld is a groundbreaking work, an elegant and illuminating analysis of the central conflict of our times: consumerist capitalism versus religious and tribal fundamentalism.
These /5(75). Democracy is being threatened, says Benjamin Barber, by a rampant, homogenizing, valueless capitalism (McWorld) on one hand and by fragmenting, fundamentalist ideologies (Jihad) on the other. The two axial principles of our age—tribalism and globalism—clash at every point except one: they may both be threatening to democracy.
Apr 25, · Benjamin R. Barber, a political theorist whose book, “Jihad vs. McWorld,” presciently analyzed the socioeconomic forces leading to the Sept. 11,attacks and a surge in tribalism.Download